Saturday, August 1, 2015

Let’s Continue to Drive Software Testing Education Forward

It’s Time to Embrace the Student Who Learns Differently


Last in a series.


In my last two posts I’ve written about enhancing the student and instructor experience in the AST’s BBST courses by focusing on updating the Fieldstones and making BBST courses more accessible by identifying some of the more common obstacles to BBST participation, and then working collectively to find ways to lower or remove those obstacles.

In this post, I want to discuss the third and final area I would like to concentrate on if elected to the Board of Directors: researching and establishing alternate approaches to teaching that better suit different learning styles.

As members of the AST, we have access to some of the best information and training available in the field of software testing. The AST hosts the Conference of the Association for Software Testing (CAST) each year, providing full-day tutorials, keynotes, and track sessions. They also offer four separate BBST courses:  Foundations, Bug Advocacy, Test Design, and the Instructors course. James Bach, Michael Bolton, Anne-Marie Charrett and Huib Schoots also offer scheduled Skype coaching. Additionally, the AST offers blog syndication, providing a one-stop shop to read the blogs of fellow AST members.

So, if we already offer all of that, why research and develop educational materials which target alternate ways of learning?

In a word, context. One thing I've learned from my involvement with tester education - whether through the AST,  work, or back in college - is that different people learn different ways. One person may learn better in a collaborative environment rather than on their own. Another may need to have information presented analytically instead of holistically, or the next might have better retention if they see material drawn out graphically instead of being written. My point is, the context in which one person best learns may be frustratingly incomprehensible to the next. Yes, we have excellent training resources, but I think it would bolster the AST’s objectives to research and implement additional teaching styles.

Another facet of my argument is about our looking to the future and finding new ways to stay relevant, ensuring the AST maintains a position of prominence and leadership within the industry. To do this, we need to advance not only the art and science of software testing, but also the methods used to teach the art and science of software testing.

This October will mark the eighth anniversary of the AST’s BBST Foundations course. That’s a lot of different classes with a lot of different students over the years. Other organizations have started to notice, and now offer their own BBST Foundations course. But I don’t see that as a problem, I see it as a success. So, let’s look for other ways in which the AST can continue to drive testing education forward.

Conclusion


I offer thanks to everyone who has read and shared my posts outlining what I hope to accomplish if elected to the AST’s Board of Directors.

I’ve worked with many of Board members in different capacities. Maybe it was in the BBST classes or with the Education Committee. Maybe it was via a Miagi-Do challenge, book club, writing assignment, or lean coffee. I have spoken with two in particular about running for the board, Michael Larsen and Justin Rohrman, and thank them for their support of my ideas. When combined with the momentum that Justin has already established by improving the BBST classes, their support gives me a head start in accomplishing these ideas. 

Let’s continue to drive software testing education forward!

9 comments:

  1. Verifiably instruction is long lasting and pervasive; it is the whole of all impacts which go to make an individual what he is, from birth to death. It incorporates the home, our neighbors, and the road among others.

    Assessments

    ReplyDelete
  2. A very excellent blog post. I am thankful for your blog post. I have found a lot of approaches after visiting your post. https://kissenglishcenter.com/phan-mem-hoc-tieng-anh-offline-mien-phi/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Like the Lady Law, training is oblivious to the deficiencies or favors of the individuals who take a taste from its pool. The general population who are not ready to get to its banks since they are hauled back by the thorns of inadequacies - financial, social or social - need to persevere through an actual existence loaded with superstition, dread, sadness, powerlessness, destitution and prohibition. Learning

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scholars have made a qualification between the motivation behind instruction and the elements of training. A reason for existing is the central objective of the procedure a conclusion to be accomplished, while Functions are different results that may happen as a characteristic aftereffect of the procedure side-effects or outcomes of tutoring. coral reef

    ReplyDelete
  5. Committed to exceed expectations in the post-auxiliary instruction, this school offer confirmation program in early youth training. Other than this, the school has a rich record for helping its understudies succeed and includes a standout amongst the best organization committed to the most noteworthy measures of guidance.
    dhirubhai ambani international school

    ReplyDelete
  6. When we truly stop to think what is really happening the whole way across the nation today it is unconscionable to believe that more than 33% of the nations school age kids are actually starving. TypicalStudent

    ReplyDelete
  7. Flawless and legendary blog, Full of sublime and virtuosic words.
    College Aid

    ReplyDelete