Skip to main content

Mission Statement, Definition of Software Testing, and Goals of Software Testing

Why I blog?
What’s the difference between a good tester and a great tester? I think the main thing is the ability to think for yourself and to be able to incorporate your experiences as a tester back into the context of your testing practices.  I think that if you look at the software testing community and pay attention to who has good ideas and who does not, you’ll find that the vast majority of people with good ideas emphasize their experience, what they have learned from it, and how they incorporate that back into their testing.

Writing about my thoughts and experiences in software testing provides an opportunity for me to take a critical look at what I thought about a subject, assess it in the context of experience and information gained since I first came to think that way, and then update or reaffirm my thoughts on the subject. It also allows me to share my thoughts, experiences, successes and failures with others, creating an additional feedback loop. That, to me, is one of the real benefits because it keeps my thoughts and beliefs relevant rather than dogmatic.

What is Software Testing?
So, if I'm planning to write about testing software, I guess I should start with what that means. If a software product is a solution to a problem, then software testing would be the activities we undertake to ensure that the solution not only addresses the problem, but that it addresses the problem correctly. Software testing transcends the traditional concept of just running test scripts on applications, and I think that’s what William Hetzel was getting at in The Complete Guide to Software Testing, when he said “testing is any activity aimed at evaluating an attribute or capability of a program or system and determining that it meets its required results.” Testing includes the analysis we perform on an oversimplified user story to find out what the meat of the story really is, the acceptance criteria we help establish, the conversations we have with the development team or product owner as the code is being written, on and on. I could even go a little on the heretical side and suggest that software testing is every activity that a tester performs that contributes to the dialog about the solution to the problem that we are trying to address.

My Purpose of Testing?
·         To ensure that the problem that is to be addressed is understood.
·         To ensure that the solution to the problem is understood.
·         To start and maintain a conversation about the problem and the solution with all involved parties while the solution is being developed.
·         To ensure that the final solution does indeed address the problem for which it was created.
·         To ensure that the problem is addressed in a complete, consistent and traceably correct manner.

Comments

  1. Wonderful opening salvo :). I'm curious to see where it leads. Good luck with this new adventure.

    --Michael

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Michael! I truly appreciate your support and encouragement!

      Delete
  2. Congratulations on writing your first blog post!

    I like that your description of testing that is focused on a solution to address a problem. I'd guess that your style involves working closely with developers as a team to meet a common goal, and I look forward to reading more about your experiences.

    Kim

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Kim.

      Yes, working closely with developers, BA's, SA's, PO's, and everyone else that is involved in the project for internally developed apps, but we also support COTS and hybrid projects as well, so it's quite the mixed bag. Plenty to come, so stay tuned and thanks for checking out the initial post.

      Delete
  3. I read this article, it is really informative one. Your way of writing and making things clear is very impressive. Thanking you for such an informative article. Deloitte Mission Statement

    ReplyDelete
  4. Best eCOGRA Sportsbook Review & Welcome Bonus 2021 - CA
    Looking for an eCOGRA Sportsbook septcasino Bonus? wooricasinos.info At this ford fusion titanium eCOGRA Sportsbook review, we're talking about a variety of ECCOGRA sportsbook deccasino promotions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Takeaways from the Continuous Automated Testing Tutorial at CAST2014

I had the opportunity to attend Noah Sussman's tutorial on Continuous Automated Testing last week as part of CAST2014. It was a great tutorial, with most of the morning spent on the theory and concepts behind continuous automated testing, and the afternoon spent with some hands-on exercises. I think that Noah really understands the problems associated with test automation in an agile environment, and the solutions that he presented in his tutorial show the true depth of his understanding of, and insight into, those problems. Here are some of the main highlights and takeaways that I got from his tutorial at CAST2014. Key Concepts Design Tools – QA and testing are design tools, and the purpose of software testing is to design systems that are deterministic Efficiency-to-Thoroughness-Trade-Offs – (ETTO) We do not always pick the best option, we pick the one that best meets the immediate needs Ironies of automation – Automation makes things more complex and, while tools can make...

Let’s Continue to Drive Software Testing Education Forward

It’s Time to Embrace the Student Who Learns Differently Last in a series. In my last two posts I’ve written about enhancing the student and instructor experience in the AST’s BBST courses by focusing on updating the Fieldstones and making BBST courses more accessible by identifying some of the more common obstacles to BBST participation, and then working collectively to find ways to lower or remove those obstacles. In this post, I want to discuss the third and final area I would like to concentrate on if elected to the Board of Directors: researching and establishing alternate approaches to teaching that better suit different learning styles. As members of the AST, we have access to some of the best information and training available in the field of software testing. The AST hosts the Conference of the Association for Software Testing (CAST) each year, providing full-day tutorials, keynotes, and track sessions. They also offer four separate BBST courses:  Foundations, ...

Book Review - The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do

If you’re a tester and you’ve been around social media, attended a conference, watched a webinar, read blog posts, or watched videos of other testers speaking on YouTube, you may have heard at least one mention of polimorphic and/or mimeomorphic actions. But what does it mean when someone says that an action is polimorphic or mimeomorphic? Where do these ideas come from, and why, as testers, do we care? The concepts of polimorphic and mimeomorphic actions come from the book The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do, by Harry Collins and Martin Kusch. In the book the authors develop a new theory about what they call the shape of actions. I’ve attempted to cover the highlights and general topics of discussion, or at least what I found most interesting, from each chapter in the summary below. Chapter 1 – Humans and Machines In Chapter 1, Collins and Kusch introduce the reader to their theory which basically states that humans can do three things – they can do polimorp...